newsTracker

Inadequate welfare humiliating: St Vinnies

NATIONAL: The head of St Vincent de Paul says giving inadequate welfare payments to unemployed people is like punishing a person who can’t walk up stairs while refusing to build a ramp.

John Falzon on Tuesday gave evidence at a Senate inquiry in Canberra investigating whether the low levels of the Newstart and Youth Allowance payments have become a barrier to people getting a job.

For years welfare and business groups have been calling for unemployment benefits to be lifted by a “modest” $50 a week, he said.

The increase could cost government about $1.5 billion a year and Workplace Minister Bill Shorten says there are no plans to boost payments any time soon.

Dr Falzon said the government’s refusal to lift payments was like “condemning people for not being able to walk up stairs while refusing to build a ramp”.

The inquiry was a waste of time because there was overwhelming evidence that forcing the unemployed into a cycle of poverty did not help their job prospects, self esteem and sometimes contributed to mental illnesses, he said.

Newstart was 40 per cent less than the minimum wage after tax, Dr Falzon said.

A $50 rise would lift this to 53 per cent, he said.

People were skipping meals to pay their power bills and could not afford job interview clothes, the hearing heard.

“Little things people take for granted like being able to turn up for a job interview having had a hair cut, or to wear neat clothes, or have dental work done, these are barriers to employment,” Dr Falzon told the hearing.

“Humiliation begets greater disempowerment.”

He said the politicisation of welfare has robbed disadvantaged people of their integrity.

Charities like his were becoming “defacto providers of social security” because of the welfare benefits did not meet people’s basic living costs.

The Senate inquiry continues.

AAP

This entry was posted in Breaking News, News and tagged , , , , ,

2 Comments

  1. Toni McPherson
    Posted August 29, 2012 at 7:03 am | Permalink

    There is one essential economic principle which is continually overlooked in debates on welfare. For every one dollar the government ‘spends’ on welfare, they receive ninety cents back through taxes and levies. Spending on welfare actually contributes to the cash flow of the nation’s economy. The other ten percent is ‘lost’ through savings. That is, people actually save ten percent of their welfare money- they have to in order to survive. Even that comes back to the government because it is eventually spent in some form such as when a person draws on their savings to pay a bill such as electricity. So, if we keep this in mind, then we are not really ‘spending’ or ‘endlessly spending’ on ingrates, loafers and bludgers but really investing in the economy and keeping the rest of the country going. The debates over welfare are really indicative of how shallow our political leaders are and their preparedness to foster a climate of disregard for the disadvantaged and less fortunate in order to further their own ideological agendas. Keeping everyone ill informed and assisted by a dumbed-down and tightly controlled media means little challenge for bad policy.

  2. Girrali
    Posted September 3, 2012 at 12:37 am | Permalink

    Thank you John Falzon, and well said Toni McPherson!

Post a Comment:

Your email address is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The Latest Videos

NAIDOC celebrations in Broken Hill

NAIDOC: Highlights of the 2013 Broken Hill NAIDOC Ball and an extended interview with award recipient Anthony Heywood.

Picture Galleries

Outback windmill

AMAZING PEOPLE, PLACES: Chris Graham travelled to Central Australia to research the affects of the Northern Territory intervention.