agendaTracker

EVIDENTLY: A new intervention?

Prime Minister Julia Gillard releasing the discussion paper Stronger Futures, which announced six weeks of consultations over the future of the NT intervention. (AAP IMAGE/ALAN PORRITT)

NATIONAL: This month, the Gillard government announced its Stronger Futures report into the future of the Northern Territory Intervention. But did the “old” intervention actually improve the lives of NT Aboriginal communities, asks PROF JON ALTMAN*.

The Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER), officially referred to as ‘Closing the Gap in the Northern Territory’ but more commonly as ‘the Intervention’ is less than a year away from its statutory end in September 2012.

It has entered a potentially transformative stage that is a critical time for sound policy making and a dangerous time for Aboriginal people in ‘prescribed’ communities, especially if bad policy is legally locked in again.

On October 13 the Australian government released its latest Closing the Gap in the Northern Territory Monitoring Report January – June 2011. It came in two parts.

The most recent data on progress suggests that the Intervention is failing, at least if its aim is to close gaps of socio-economic disadvantage between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians in the NT.

This view can only be surmised because evidently measuring gap reduction, at least in the bizarre world of Indigenous public policy in Australia, can be magically undertaken without any comparative data on non-Indigenous outcomes.

The report notes that while policies designed to improve can have a significant immediate effect (negative as well as positive?) this is the exception rather than the rule, as it will take a concerted effort over many years to achieve lasting change.

This is undeniable, but it begs the question of why the Australian government is expending millions on six monthly monitoring?

Even assuming that the policy aim is to improve the absolute wellbeing of Aboriginal residents of NTER communities – a more realistic and appropriate goal than closing statistical gaps – according to time series information available for four areas, this is just not happening.

Since 2007–08 Indigenous hospitalisation rates NT-wide (not just in NTER communities) have increased from 229 per 1,000 to 262 per 1,000.
These are extraordinarily high rates unimagined in the broader community.

Recorded school enrolment and attendance has declined from 64.5 percent in February 2009 to 62.7 percent in February 2011 with total enrolments declining from 8,960 to 8,914, despite rapid population growth.

Income support recipients have increased from just on 20,000 in June 2009 to nearly 24,000 in June 2011, with some of the change explained by new (‘non-grandfathered’) CDEP participants being shifted onto Newstart.

In the name of job creation, welfare dependence is increasing.

Reports of child abuse in NTER communities have increased from 174 in 2007–08 to 272 in 2010–11; as have domestic violence reported incidents, from 1,612 to 2,968.

And the gap in child protection indicators between Indigenous and non-Indigenous has increased across the NT for a range of indicators.
The most shocking statistic is on confirmed attempt suicide/self harm incidents that have increased from 109 in 2007–08 to 227 in 2010–11 in NTER communities.

This statistic is embedded in Figure 6.4 of the report, without any commentary.

If such a per capita rate was replicated in Sydney it would be about 22,700. Imagine the outcry!

It was buried in the report, but registered as ‘a concern’ according to a spokeswoman speaking for Minister Macklin.

The Australian government response to what looks awfully like policy failure is to promulgate more of the same.
This is the strong impression one gets when reading Stronger Futures in the Northern Territory Report on Consultations October 2011 released four days later.

The discussion paper and community consultations did not provide any of the factual information outlined above to inform small group (Tier 1) and community (Tier 2) ‘consultations’, about the Australian government’s performance to date. In fact, the Australian government predetermined that the community consultation would focus on eight areas: school attendance and educational achievement; economic development and employment; tackling alcohol abuse; community safety and protection of children; health; food security; housing and governance.

It also engaged consultants, many ex-bureaucrats, to monitor proceedings to assure the Australian public that consultations were conducted properly.

A report by Cultural & Indigenous Research Centre Australia (CIRCA) dated September 2011 indicated that the facilitated discussions conducted over six weeks appeared open, fair and accountable.

CIRCA did observe, critically, that the upmarket Crowne Plaza Hotel, where the Alice Springs Town Camp meeting was held, may have been an unfamiliar, uncomfortable and unfriendly venue.

It also noted that some meetings were very long (four to five hours) and food needed to be provided as people were showing signs of hunger and exhaustion.

CIRCA, however, made no comment on the predetermined subject of consultations — this was reminiscent of consultations about the future of income management in 2009 that would not countenance the possibility of abolition.

Nor was there any consideration that the intervention approach and its monitoring framework might be fundamentally flawed.

So, let’s look at evidence from the four key areas of hospitalisation, education, employment and child abuse.
Policy success would suggest that over time there should be less hospitalisation and child abuse and better education and employment outcomes.

But the correlations between interventions and improved outcomes are quite unclear.

Should more medical attention result in more or less hospitalisation? Should more police results in more or less reported crime?

Should more jobs result in more or less welfare dependence?

And should more teachers, new teacher houses and better school infrastructure result in more or less attendance?

The possibility of such ambiguity indicates that the current policy of closing the gap and its monitoring framework is poorly designed and confused.

The government can make what it chooses of the rubbery figures, possibly the intention?

Nowhere is the policy confusion more evident than in the vexed area of school attendance, with failure being blamed on parents and withdrawal of welfare entitlements proposed as the possible solution.

Historically, welfare or transfer payments have been a social policy instrument to provide income support for individuals and families in need.
In policy circles there is an emerging view that welfare sanctions can be used to effectively alter social norms, to alter expenditure patterns via income management and to improve school attendance.

However, there is no evidence that school absentees are disproportionately the dependents of welfare beneficiaries.

Nor is there any evidence either here or internationally that punitive measures against parents will ensure school attendance, although there is a distinct possibility that children will suffer.

The NT government has recently introduced its Every Child Every Day policy; and has amended its education laws to enhance the powers of school attendance truancy officers and significantly increase fines for truancy.

The Australian and NT governments are in policy and potential legal conflict here, one government looking to fine, the other looking to take away the means to pay fines, with parental imprisonment a likely unintended consequence of school absenteeism.

It is hard to imagine such an outcome being good either for the child or family relations. Simultaneously, such discourse is imbued with a policy moral hazard of taking the attention away from the school system as a potential part of the problem, is school attendance failure a function of inappropriate curricula, poor teacher performance and an inability to stimulate students?

Is there something systemic that makes kids prefer the mundane everyday to the supposed inspiration of school attendance?

These are the sorts of hard policy questions that are being avoided in the quest for simplistic and populist solutions to deeply entrenched problems.

If the Intervention policy framework is wrong, why is it about to be continued? Even evidence from the government’s own monitoring is being ignored.

Instead the cozy Canberra consensus of political and bureaucratic classes believe they have the answers. Politicians in their political self-interest are donning ideological blinkers and listening too much to urban focus groups, rather than developing realistic policy in the interests of Indigenous residents of NTER communities.

And complacent and complicit senior bureaucrats appear too comfortable with the status quo they invented and the policy inertia born of bedded down approaches and the persuasive ring of the persistent Close the Gap mantra.

Deeply disadvantaged people in remote Northern Territory deserve far better. Policy instruments need to be deployed that generate improvement in absolute, not relative, wellbeing and that can be monitored less ambiguously. Otherwise the millions spent on reporting is a waste.

Evidently, we need a new evidence-based framework; but the innovation required is most likely to come from the marginalised subjects of this grand project of improvement rather than from the powerful, but distant and unconnected.

*Professor Jon Altman is a research professor at the Australian National University. He has worked on Indigenous economic development issues since 1976. From 1990-2010 he was the Foundation Director at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research.

This entry was posted in Opinion and tagged , , , ,

5 Comments

  1. john harding
    Posted November 4, 2011 at 6:29 am | Permalink

    Brilliant article! Ironic that such a man isn’t being consulted, and lives in Canberra, I am incredulous!

  2. Niamh Keane
    Posted November 15, 2011 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Well said Jon Altman, I really wish there was someone like you in the position of putting in some decent policy in respect of our indigenous citizens, instead of the offensive dogs dinner of policies we have now…. I intend to pass this article on to those comfy Canberrans in the hope that it will give them half an idea of how to behave towards their fellow man…

  3. Paul Christie
    Posted November 15, 2011 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Brillant article and a clear reminder of what is essential in forming policy yet the most common aspect that is ignored..The human facts on the ground.
    There was a huge push under Howard to all but destroy the presence of facts in policy making, and transfered the focus of policy making to his interpretation of the mystical “middle Australia” he so eloquently spoke for and championed. Australian Politics has not recovered and has now firmly entered the political culture of the US where base emotions like fear and greed and the lowest common denominators dictate policy, where sound bites and personalities are the focus of the average persons political debate.

  4. Toni McPherson
    Posted November 24, 2011 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Well said Jon Altman. If we consider for a moment that racism is not just an overt physical application but a more active methodology the reason this policy continues becomes evident. By definition racism is the belief in cultural superiority. With this in mind the underlying problem lies in the idea that Aboriginal people are primitive and still on the path to civilisation in order to take up their civic duties in line with the wider community who believe themselves to be culturally superior. In this way there is never any self-reflection by policy makers, governments, the media or the community as to the impact these beliefs and ideas have on continuing a detrimental policy like the NTER. Always the inference is there that Aboriginal people need to be brought in to step with the more morally productive citizens which will magically alter the disadvantage that exists in our Western Liberal Democracies. There is no discussion of the disadvantaged position of Aboriginal people that was established at Port Jackson when Bennelong was captured in order to establish a relationship between Aboriginal people and the settler state. At no time is there any discussion of the relationship that is structured to dispossess Aboriginal people and keep them in a disadvantaged position. I hold little hope that the government will cease to perpetuate this disadvantage because it fails to investigate the assumptions policymakers use in problem definition and analysis never recognise their own values and ideology that continue to drive sympathies and Aboriginal Affairs policy ever forward to progress the governments agenda and those of the vocal minority.

  5. Posted January 24, 2013 at 7:56 am | Permalink

    Among the finest strategies to look younger is to stay away from using tobacco. An additional advantage of not smoking is that you will are living longer than if you smoke. Having said that, it is crucial in order to avoid both principal and supplementary smoking mainly because it has very harsh consequences to the body. [url=http://timberlandnederland.webnode.nl/]Timberland Sale[/url] If you want to steer clear of any possible rear trauma or perhaps just want to ease your own back pain, it is crucial that you in no way make an effort to bend more than from a ranking situation. Generally flex your knees and function to reduce your entire body. Allowing your back again and its particular muscle tissues to deal with the brunt might cause discomfort. [url=http://uggbelgique.npage.be/]Ugg Pas Cher[/url] Are you presently more educated in relation to digital photography? Do you have a concept or have you got a greater concept now? Have your abilities improved? Is it possible to now use stuff that work with you? With any good luck, the tips previously mentioned ought to have created better responses and helped anyone to boost your picture taking expertise.Simple Methods For Treating And Controlling Anxiety Attacks [url=http://uggsoutletrotterdam0.jouwweb.nl/]Uggs Outlet Amsterdam[/url] An easy way to epidermis nuts. When utilized in food preparation, almonds including walnuts and pistachios need to have their skin removed. Blanch the nuts by boiling hot them inside a pan water for one moment. Deplete the nuts, and place them on a thoroughly clean dishtowel. Fold the meal bath towel across the nuts, and rub extensively. The skin will massage off of onto the cloth. [url=http://uggsoutletrotterdam0.jouwweb.nl/]Uggs Outlet Amsterdam[/url] In order to avoid losing a lot of dollars, you can put an end decrease buy on some of your inventory holdings. This way, if the buying price of the supply falls listed below a particular predetermined value, it is going to automatically be sold. That can help ensure that you is not going to shed significant amounts of cash when the carry plunges. [url=http://uggsoutletrotterdam0.jouwweb.nl/]Uggs Outlet Amsterdam[/url] Need a lot of vino to get a large wedding ceremony, get together or any other celebration? Take into account purchasing Cava, which will come from Spain. This cost-effective style of wines never disappoints having its flavour, texture or cost. There are lots of companies offered, that will impress your friends and family and maintain your finances nicely balanced, also.
    http://www.raspberryroaddesigns.net/forum/member.php?433853-dordboongeCot
    http://lanclan.com/forums/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29590
    http://www.protic.net/heritage/heritage2010/santerref/forum/profile.php?id=76795
    http://vb.dboor.com/member.php?59140-Oretleerura
    http://www.psp-vault.com/forums/member.php?u=654047

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] For example, 63.1% of respondents said they agreed with the statement that school attendance had increased from three years ago. This is clearly incorrect. Hard data shows that school attendance has not increased under the Intervention. [...]

  2. [...] http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/01/the-intervention-is-dead-long-live-the-intervention/ http://tracker.org.au/2011/11/evidently-a-new-intervention/ 1 Nov 11: “The Northern Territory Emergency Response (NTER) intervention officially referred [...]

Post a Comment:

Your email address is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The Latest Videos

Queensland’s Fantome history

QLD: In 1945 seven year-old Joe Eggmolesse was diagnosed with Leprosy. He was taken from his family under police escort, transported by rail and sea over a thousand kilometres to Fantome Island where he was to be incarcerated for the next ten years.

Picture Galleries

Boomerang 9

The Boomerang Festival was held on the October Long Weekend on Byron Bay.